Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gibson, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    16 views2 pages
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Bernard Gibson, Sr.'s appeal of a district court's denial of part of his motion filed under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, as it determined the criminal judgment from November 2002 accurately reflected the life sentence announced at Gibson's resentencing hearing. Therefore, the appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-11-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6970

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Bernard Gibson, Sr.'s appeal of a district court's denial of part of his motion filed under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, as it determined the criminal judgment from November 2002 accurately reflected the life sentence announced at Gibson's resentencing hearing. Therefore, the appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    16 views2 pages

    United States v. Gibson, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Bernard Gibson, Sr.'s appeal of a district court's denial of part of his motion filed under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, as it determined the criminal judgment from November 2002 accurately reflected the life sentence announced at Gibson's resentencing hearing. Therefore, the appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6970

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    BERNARD GIBSON, SR., a/k/a Bernard Willis,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge.
    (8:94-cr-00454-PJM)

    Submitted: October 31, 2006

    Decided:

    November 6, 2006

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Bernard Gibson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Bernard Gibson, Sr., appeals the district courts order
    denying in part his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.
    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We find

    that the criminal judgment filed in November 2002 accurately


    reflects the life sentence announced at the resentencing hearing.
    Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief.

    United States v.

    Gibson, No. 8:94-cr-00454-PJM (D. Md. filed May 8, 2006, and


    entered May 9, 2006).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like