Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Redd v. United States, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Derrick Vincent Redd appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court's opinion, and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Redd's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Redd was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-04-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6152

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Derrick Vincent Redd appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court's opinion, and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Redd's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Redd was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Redd v. United States, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Derrick Vincent Redd appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court's opinion, and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Redd's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Redd was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6152

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DERRICK VINCENT REDD,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-6, CA-00-642)

    Submitted:

    April 12, 2001

    Decided:

    April 18, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Derrick Vincent Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Andrew Spencer,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Derrick Vincent Redd seeks to appeal the district courts
    orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West
    Supp. 2000) and his motion for reconsideration.

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts memorandum opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

    ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district


    court.

    See United States v. Redd, Nos. CR-97-6; CA-00-642 (E.D.

    Va. filed Oct. 12, 2000, entered Oct. 13, 2000; Nov. 3, 2000).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like