Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wilkins v. Grenfell, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    1) David Wilkins appealed the district court's dismissal of his claim for property damages to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 2) The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing Wilkins' claim for property damages based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-04-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6357

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) David Wilkins appealed the district court's dismissal of his claim for property damages to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 2) The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing Wilkins' claim for property damages based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Wilkins v. Grenfell, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) David Wilkins appealed the district court's dismissal of his claim for property damages to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 2) The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing Wilkins' claim for property damages based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6357

    DAVID WILKINS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    STEPHEN GRENFELL; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE
    STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-02-166-AW)

    Submitted:

    April 18, 2002

    Decided:

    April 30, 2002

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    David Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    David Wilkins appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his claim for property damages. We have reviewed the record and the
    district courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    Wilkins v.

    Grenfell, No. CA-02-166-AW (D. Md. filed Jan. 23, 2002; entered
    Jan. 24, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like