Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Abbott v. Guenther, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to Daniel Guenther in a case brought by Paul Abbott and Elaine Barker. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-04-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-1405

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to Daniel Guenther in a case brought by Paul Abbott and Elaine Barker. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    Abbott v. Guenther, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to Daniel Guenther in a case brought by Paul Abbott and Elaine Barker. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-1405

    PAUL ABBOTT; ELAINE BARKER,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    DANIEL GUENTHER, Esquire,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09cv-02642-RWT)

    Submitted:

    March 23, 2011

    Decided:

    April 7, 2011

    Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Paul Abbott, Elaine Barker, Appellants Pro Se.


    Mark Patrick
    Johnson, ECCLESTON & WOLF PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Paul

    Abbott

    and

    Elaine

    Barker

    appeal

    the

    district

    courts order granting Defendants motion for summary judgment.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    Abbott v. Guenther, No. 8:09-cv-02642-RWT (D. Md. Mar.

    court.

    10, 2010).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like