Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Botelho-Perez, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Stephen Botelho-Perez, a federal inmate, appealed the district court's denial of his motion to correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Botelho-Perez's motion based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-04-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-8011

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Stephen Botelho-Perez, a federal inmate, appealed the district court's denial of his motion to correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Botelho-Perez's motion based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Botelho-Perez, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stephen Botelho-Perez, a federal inmate, appealed the district court's denial of his motion to correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Botelho-Perez's motion based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-8011

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    STEPHEN EDWIN BOTELHO-PEREZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Robert G. Doumar, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-02-124)

    Submitted:

    April 14, 2005

    Decided:

    April 20, 2005

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Stephen Edwin Botelho-Perez, Appellant Pro Se.


    John Evan
    DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Stephen Edwin Botelho-Perez, a federal inmate, appeals
    the district courts order denying his motion to correct his
    sentence.

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on

    the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. BotehloPerez, No. CR-02-124 (E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 2004).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like