Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ekeke v. Federal Home, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Iheanyi Ekeke filed a civil action against the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and several individuals. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Ekeke appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-09-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-1758

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Iheanyi Ekeke filed a civil action against the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and several individuals. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Ekeke appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Ekeke v. Federal Home, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Iheanyi Ekeke filed a civil action against the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and several individuals. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Ekeke appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-1758

    IHEANYI EKEKE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; FRANK
    VETRANO; ANN SCHNARE; ROBERT PARKER,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-95-1665-A)
    Submitted:

    September 11, 1997

    Decided:

    September 18, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Iheanyi Ekeke, Appellant Pro Se. Diane Marshall Ennist, FEDERAL
    HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, McLean, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in Appellants civil action. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Ekeke v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., No. CA-95-1665-A
    (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like