Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Kinney, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Lemuel Kinney's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It also denied Kinney's motion to supplement the record on appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6666

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Lemuel Kinney's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It also denied Kinney's motion to supplement the record on appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Kinney, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Lemuel Kinney's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It also denied Kinney's motion to supplement the record on appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6666

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LEMUEL KINNEY,
    Defendant - Appellant,
    and
    ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (CR-94-57-A, CA-95-1697-AM)
    Submitted:

    October 8, 1996

    Decided:

    October 22, 1996

    Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Lemuel Kinney, Appellant Pro Se. Natalia Combs Greene, William T.
    Henderson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lemuel Kinney appeals from the district court's order dismissing his motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1994), as amended by
    Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
    104-132, 110 Stat. 114. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
    Kinney, Nos. CR-94-57-A; CA-95-1697-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 1996).
    Kinney's motion to supplement the record on appeal is denied.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like