Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Ernest Williams appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible errors. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Williams a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6558

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ernest Williams appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible errors. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Williams a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ernest Williams appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible errors. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Williams a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6558

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ERNEST A. WILLIAMS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District
    Judge. (CR-92-113-MU, CA-96-66-3-MU)
    Submitted:

    October 17, 1996

    Decided:

    October 24, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ernest A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning
    of the district court. United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-92-113MU; CA-96-66-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like