Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Smith, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Larry Antoine Smith appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Smith's motion for a reduced sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6593

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Larry Antoine Smith appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Smith's motion for a reduced sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Smith, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Larry Antoine Smith appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Smith's motion for a reduced sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6593

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LARRY ANTOINE SMITH, a/k/a Larry Antoinne
    Smith,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-93-7-3-P)
    Submitted:

    August 15, 1996

    Decided:

    August 21, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Larry Antoine Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    Motion For Reduction of Sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. 3582(c)(2)
    (West Supp. 1996). We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
    Smith, No. CR-93-7-3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 1996). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like