Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    1) Barry Glen Thompson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Thompson a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-06-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6341

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Barry Glen Thompson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Thompson a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Barry Glen Thompson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Thompson a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6341

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    BARRY GLEN THOMPSON, a/k/a Berry G. Thompson,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-95-115, CA-97-429-6)
    Submitted:

    May 14, 1998

    Decided:

    June 3, 1998

    Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Susan Graham James, Montgomery, Alabama, for Appellant. Monica
    Kaminski Schwartz, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
    United States v. Thompson, Nos. CR-95-115; CA-97-429-6 (S.D.W. Va.
    Feb. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like