Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jack v. Robinson, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    James Lee Jack filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was dismissed by the district court for failure to state a claim. Jack appealed the dismissal. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-03-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7580

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    James Lee Jack filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was dismissed by the district court for failure to state a claim. Jack appealed the dismissal. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Jack v. Robinson, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James Lee Jack filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was dismissed by the district court for failure to state a claim. Jack appealed the dismissal. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7580

    JAMES L. JACK,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    A. DAVID ROBINSON, Warden; JANET TERRY, Law
    Library
    Coordinator;
    SERGEANT
    FRAME,
    Correctional Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (CA-00-830-3)

    Submitted:

    February 20, 2003

    Decided:

    March 10, 2003

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James L. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James Lee Jack appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) amended complaint for failure to state
    a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
    1915A (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See Jack v. Robinson, No. CA-00-830-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 16,

    2002).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like