Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Daley, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Richard Daley's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The unpublished opinion, issued per curiam, found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Daley's motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Daley's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-01-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7713

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Richard Daley's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The unpublished opinion, issued per curiam, found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Daley's motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Daley's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Daley, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Richard Daley's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The unpublished opinion, issued per curiam, found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Daley's motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Daley's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7713

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    RICHARD CHARLES DALEY,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:02-cr-00251-REP-2)

    Submitted:

    January 13, 2009

    Decided:

    January 20, 2009

    Before WILLIAMS, Chief, Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit


    Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert
    James
    Wagner,
    Assistant
    Federal
    Public
    Defender,
    Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant.
    Richard Daniel Cooke,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Richard

    Charles

    Daley

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18


    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    See United States v.

    Daley, No. 3:02-cr-00251-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 11, 2008).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    the

    facts

    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like