Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Orr, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed a district court's denial of Richard Orr's motion to correct alleged errors in his Presentence Investigation Report. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons provided in that court's June 19, 2008 decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-10-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7109

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed a district court's denial of Richard Orr's motion to correct alleged errors in his Presentence Investigation Report. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons provided in that court's June 19, 2008 decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views2 pages

    United States v. Orr, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed a district court's denial of Richard Orr's motion to correct alleged errors in his Presentence Investigation Report. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons provided in that court's June 19, 2008 decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7109

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    RICHARD A. ORR,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap.
    James P. Jones, Chief
    District Judge. (2:00-cr-10067-jpj-1)

    Submitted:

    October 21, 2008

    Decided:

    October 28, 2008

    Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Richard A. Orr, Appellant Pro Se.


    Assistant United States Attorney,
    Appellee.

    Steven Randall Ramseyer,


    Abingdon, Virginia, for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Richard
    denying

    his

    A.

    motion

    Orr
    to

    Investigation Report.
    reversible error.

    appeals
    correct

    the

    district

    errors

    in

    courts

    the

    order

    Presentence

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    See United States v. Orr, No. 2:00-cr-

    10067-jpj-1 (W.D. Va. June 19, 2008).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like