Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Godfrey v. Davie County NC, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of a civil action filed by John and Patricia Godfrey against Davie County, North Carolina and other defendants. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-09-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1846

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of a civil action filed by John and Patricia Godfrey against Davie County, North Carolina and other defendants. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Godfrey v. Davie County NC, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of a civil action filed by John and Patricia Godfrey against Davie County, North Carolina and other defendants. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1846

    PATRICIA GODFREY; JOHN F. GODFREY,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    versus
    DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, all unknown
    persons or agents; CINDY JUSTICE, Social
    Worker; MALISSA HILL, Social Worker; DAVIE
    COUNTY
    DEPARTMENT
    OF
    SOCIAL
    SERVICES,
    Mocksville, North Carolina,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-04-719-7)

    Submitted:

    September 16, 2004

    Decided:

    September 21, 2004

    Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Patricia Godfrey, John F. Godfrey, Appellants Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    John and Patricia Godfrey appeal the district courts
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    dismissing without prejudice their civil action.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Godfrey v. Davie

    County, No. CA-04-719-7 (D.S.C. filed June 4 & entered June 7,


    2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like