You are on page 1of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7845

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WAVERLY JERMAINE JORDAN, a/k/a Waverley Jermaine Jordan,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District
Judge. (5:04-cr-00025-gec-bwc)

Submitted:

July 27, 2009

Decided:

August 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew M. Robinson, ROBINSON & BRANDT, P.S.C., Covington,


Kentucky, for Appellant.
Julia C. Dudley, United States
Attorney, Jean B. Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney,
Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:
Waverly Jermaine Jordan appeals the district courts
order granting his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C.

3582(c)(2)

(2006).

We

have

reviewed

the

parties

briefs on appeal, the joint appendix, and the supplemental joint


appendix and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v.

Jordan, No. 5:04-cr-00025-gec-bwc (W.D. Va. July 8, 2008); see


also United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 251-53 (4th Cir.)
(holding that proceedings under 3582(c)(2) do not constitute
a full resentencing of the defendant and rejecting appellants
argument

that

United

States

v.

Booker,

543

U.S.

220

(2005),

should apply in 3582 proceedings), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct.


2401 (2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


before

the

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

You might also like