Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. James Long, 61 F.3d 897, 3rd Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views1 page
    The Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the Western District of Pennsylvania in the case of United States v. James Long. The case involved an appeal from a decision in the Western District of Pennsylvania with case number 93-00220. Per the rules of the Third Circuit, opinions are only published in the Federal Reporter if they are considered to have precedential or institutional value; otherwise, opinions are ordinarily not published if they are only considered to have value to the trial court or parties.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-06-13 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 61 F.3d 897 Docket: 94-3336

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the Western District of Pennsylvania in the case of United States v. James Long. The case involved an appeal from a decision in the Western District of Pennsylvania with case number 93-00220. Per the rules of the Third Circuit, opinions are only published in the Federal Reporter if they are considered to have precedential or institutional value; otherwise, opinions are ordinarily not published if they are only considered to have value to the trial court or parties.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views1 page

    United States v. James Long, 61 F.3d 897, 3rd Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the Western District of Pennsylvania in the case of United States v. James Long. The case involved an appeal from a decision in the Western District of Pennsylvania with case number 93-00220. Per the rules of the Third Circuit, opinions are only published in the Federal Reporter if they are considered to have precedential or institutional value; otherwise, opinions are ordinarily not published if they are only considered to have value to the trial court or parties.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    61 F.

    3d 897

    U.S.
    v.
    James Long
    NO. 94-3336

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Third Circuit.
    June 13, 1995
    Appeal From: W.D.Pa., No. 93-00220
    1

    AFFIRMED.

    2
    Federal
    Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions
    having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value
    only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter
    tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished
    per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of
    each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating
    Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)

    You might also like