Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Under Seal v. Under Seal, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of various motions filed by plaintiffs. The district court had denied the motions for lack of jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The Court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its July 29, 2009 order. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-03-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-1970

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of various motions filed by plaintiffs. The district court had denied the motions for lack of jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The Court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its July 29, 2009 order. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Under Seal v. Under Seal, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of various motions filed by plaintiffs. The district court had denied the motions for lack of jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The Court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its July 29, 2009 order. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-1970

    UNDER SEAL,
    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    UNDER SEAL,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
    Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00028-JPB)

    Submitted:

    February 19, 2010

    Decided:

    March 11, 2010

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Under Seal, Appellants Pro Se. Jason Patrick Foster, STEPTOE &
    JOHNSON, LLP, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Plaintiffs appeal the district courts order denying
    their

    various

    motions

    for

    lack

    of

    jurisdiction.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Under

    Seal v. Under Seal, No. 3:09-cv-00028-JPB (N.D. W. Va. July 29,


    2009).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like