Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jones v. Hartwell, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Sherman E. Jones filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Hartwell of the Albemarle County Regional Jail which was denied by the district court. Jones appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-08-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6394

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Sherman E. Jones filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Hartwell of the Albemarle County Regional Jail which was denied by the district court. Jones appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Jones v. Hartwell, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Sherman E. Jones filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Hartwell of the Albemarle County Regional Jail which was denied by the district court. Jones appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6394

    SHERMAN E. JONES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    OFFICER HARTWELL, Albemarle County Regional
    Jail,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-00-86-7)

    Submitted:

    August 24, 2000

    Decided:

    August 29, 2000

    Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Sherman E. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Sherman E. Jones appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

    the district court. See Jones v. Hartwell, No. CA-00-86-7 (W.D. Va.
    Mar. 13, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like