Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Lamont David Smith appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's denial of Smith's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court decided the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-10-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7416

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lamont David Smith appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's denial of Smith's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court decided the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lamont David Smith appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's denial of Smith's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court decided the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7416

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    LAMONT DAVID SMITH,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
    Frederick P. Stamp,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:95-cr-00036-FPS-JSK-1)

    Submitted:

    September 1, 2009

    Decided:

    October 14, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lamont David Smith, Appellant Pro Se.


    Robert Hugh McWilliams,
    Jr., John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorneys,
    Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lamont David Smith appeals the district courts order
    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
    of sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.
    JSK-1

    (N.D.W.

    United States v. Smith, No. 1:95-cr-00036-FPSVa.

    July

    21,

    2009).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like