Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stone v. Murphy, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Tammy Stone appealed a district court's denial of her civil complaint to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision based on the reasoning provided in that court's November 10, 2003 ruling. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-10-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-2501

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tammy Stone appealed a district court's denial of her civil complaint to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision based on the reasoning provided in that court's November 10, 2003 ruling. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Stone v. Murphy, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tammy Stone appealed a district court's denial of her civil complaint to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision based on the reasoning provided in that court's November 10, 2003 ruling. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-2501

    TAMMY M. STONE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DONNA KAY MURPHY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II,
    District Judge. (CA-03-2241-2)

    Submitted:

    August 27, 2004

    Decided:

    October 21, 2004

    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Tammy M. Stone, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Tammy

    M.

    Stone

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying her


    civil

    complaint.

    reversible error.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court.

    See Stone v. Murphy, No. CA-03-2241-2 (S.D.W. Va.

    Nov. 10, 2003).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like