Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Chandler v. Netherland, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Linwood Earl Chandler's appeal of a district court ruling. The district court had denied relief on Chandler's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), finding that the complaint failed to state a claim. The Court of Appeals agrees with the district court's reasoning and dismisses the appeal, also denying Chandler's motion for sanctions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-07-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6620

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Linwood Earl Chandler's appeal of a district court ruling. The district court had denied relief on Chandler's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), finding that the complaint failed to state a claim. The Court of Appeals agrees with the district court's reasoning and dismisses the appeal, also denying Chandler's motion for sanctions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Chandler v. Netherland, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Linwood Earl Chandler's appeal of a district court ruling. The district court had denied relief on Chandler's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), finding that the complaint failed to state a claim. The Court of Appeals agrees with the district court's reasoning and dismisses the appeal, also denying Chandler's motion for sanctions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6620

    LINWOOD EARL CHANDLER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    A. D. NETHERLAND, Acting Captain; W. M. PENN,
    Lieutenant; DAVID BARNES, Doctor; L. COLLINS,
    Inmate Adjustment Hearing Officer; ALTON
    BASKERVILLE, Warden,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-01-1911)

    Submitted:

    July 18, 2002

    Decided:

    July 24, 2002

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Linwood Earl Chandler, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Linwood Earl Chandler, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district
    courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp.
    2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 2001).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts order and
    agree

    that

    Chandlers

    complaint

    fails

    to

    state

    claim.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district


    court.

    Chandler v. Netherland, No. CA-01-1911 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12,

    2002).

    We also deny Chandlers motion for sanctions.

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like