Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Richardson v. Eagleton, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Curtis Dale Richardson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. In an unpublished, and therefore non-precedential, opinion, the appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its March 17, 2005 decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-10-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6611

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Curtis Dale Richardson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. In an unpublished, and therefore non-precedential, opinion, the appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its March 17, 2005 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Richardson v. Eagleton, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Curtis Dale Richardson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. In an unpublished, and therefore non-precedential, opinion, the appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its March 17, 2005 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6611

    CURTIS DALE RICHARDSON,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden, Evans Correctional
    Institution; JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director,
    SCDC,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
    (CA-01-2553-1)

    Submitted:

    October 20, 2005

    Decided:

    October 26, 2005

    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Curtis Dale Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II,
    WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Curtis Dale Richardson appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Richardson v.

    Eagleton, No. CA-01-2553-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 17, 2005).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like