Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Thomas James Morgan, 848 F.2d 186, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    Thomas James Morgan appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the lower court's reasoning for denying Morgan's appeal without merit. The Fourth Circuit found the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the district court's opinion and materials, making oral arguments unnecessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-05-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 848 F.2d 186 Docket: 88-7544

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Thomas James Morgan appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the lower court's reasoning for denying Morgan's appeal without merit. The Fourth Circuit found the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the district court's opinion and materials, making oral arguments unnecessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    United States v. Thomas James Morgan, 848 F.2d 186, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Thomas James Morgan appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the lower court's reasoning for denying Morgan's appeal without merit. The Fourth Circuit found the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the district court's opinion and materials, making oral arguments unnecessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    848 F.

    2d 186
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Thomas James MORGAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 88-7544.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: April 27, 1988.
    Decided: May 23, 1988.

    Thomas James Morgan, appellant pro se.


    Thomas Oliver Mucklow (Office of the U.S. Attorney), for appellee.
    Before DONALD RUSSEL, MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Thomas James Morgan appeals from the district court's order refusing relief
    under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this
    appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Morgan, C/A No. 87-84-E(K); CR No. 84-2-K-04
    (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 27, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like