Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Figueroa v. United States, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Figueroa's motion requesting the return of certain properties allegedly forfeited by the United States. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's reasoning that Figueroa was not entitled to return of the properties. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-2112

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Figueroa's motion requesting the return of certain properties allegedly forfeited by the United States. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's reasoning that Figueroa was not entitled to return of the properties. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Figueroa v. United States, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Figueroa's motion requesting the return of certain properties allegedly forfeited by the United States. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's reasoning that Figueroa was not entitled to return of the properties. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-2112

    ANTHONY D. FIGUEROA,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA95-2441-DKC)
    Submitted:

    October 17, 1996

    Decided:

    October 25, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Anthony D. Figueroa, Appellant Pro Se. Kaye A. Allison, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    motion requesting return of certain properties allegedly forfeited
    by the United States. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Figueroa v. United
    States, No. CA-95-2441-DKC (D. Md. July 17, 1996). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like