Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jesse J. Pritchard, Jr. v. F. Finkbinder J.P. Mitchell R. Landon Dr. Liu Dr. Ripon W. Laroche, II, 804 F.2d 678, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1986 in which Jesse Pritchard appealed the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding the appeal without merit based on issues already decided by authoritative decisions. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied relief on November 20, 1985 in case number 85-0037-L.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-11-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 804 F.2d 678 Docket: 85-7086

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1986 in which Jesse Pritchard appealed the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding the appeal without merit based on issues already decided by authoritative decisions. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied relief on November 20, 1985 in case number 85-0037-L.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Jesse J. Pritchard, Jr. v. F. Finkbinder J.P. Mitchell R. Landon Dr. Liu Dr. Ripon W. Laroche, II, 804 F.2d 678, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1986 in which Jesse Pritchard appealed the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding the appeal without merit based on issues already decided by authoritative decisions. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied relief on November 20, 1985 in case number 85-0037-L.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    804 F.

    2d 678
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Jesse J. PRITCHARD, Jr., Appellant,
    v.
    F. FINKBINDER; J.P. Mitchell; R. Landon; Dr. Liu; Dr.
    Ripon W. Laroche, II, Appellees.
    No. 85-7086.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 24, 1986.
    Decided Nov. 5, 1986.

    Jesse J. Pritchard, Jr., appellant pro se.


    Elizabeth M. Allen, Eric K.G. Fiske, Assistant Attorney General, for
    appellees.
    W.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
    the district court. Pritchard v. Finkbinder, C/A No. 85-0037-L (W.D.Va., Nov.
    20, 1985).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like