Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tolson v. Wallace, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Larry Tolson filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against Steve Wallace and Jerry Montee that was denied by the district court. Tolson appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Tolson's request for mandamus relief and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-12-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7147

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Larry Tolson filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against Steve Wallace and Jerry Montee that was denied by the district court. Tolson appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Tolson's request for mandamus relief and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Tolson v. Wallace, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Larry Tolson filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against Steve Wallace and Jerry Montee that was denied by the district court. Tolson appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Tolson's request for mandamus relief and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7147

    LARRY A. TOLSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    STEVE WALLACE,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    JERRY MONTEE,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-99-8315-H)

    Submitted:

    November 29, 2001

    Decided:

    December 6, 2001

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Larry A. Tolson, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart, SUMRELL,
    SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Larry A. Tolson appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

    the district court.

    See Tolson v. Wallace, No. CA-99-8315-H

    (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2001).

    We deny Tolsons request for mandamus

    relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like