Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Faison v. Elswick, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Dossie Faison, Jr. of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion. The appellate court declined to hold oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-12-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6752

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Dossie Faison, Jr. of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion. The appellate court declined to hold oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Faison v. Elswick, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Dossie Faison, Jr. of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion. The appellate court declined to hold oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6752

    DOSSIE FAISON, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    YVONNE ELSWICK; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; P.
    TRUE; RICHARD A. YOUNG; J. ARMENTROUT; J.
    BENTLEY; GARY BUNN; RON ANGELONE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-00-00381-7)

    Submitted:

    November 30, 2000

    Decided:

    December 8, 2000

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Dossie Faison, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Dossie Faison, Jr., appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

    the district court. See Faison v. Elswick, No. CA-00-00381-7 (W.D.


    Va. May 19, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like