Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William Herman Glazebrook v. William P. Rogers, Warden, 819 F.2d 1137, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    William Herman Glazebrook filed a Section 1983 claim against prison officials which the district court denied. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found his appeal to be without merit based on recent authoritative decisions. The appeals court denied Glazebrook in forma pauperis status, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Glazebrook's initial Section 1983 claim.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-05-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 819 F.2d 1137 Docket: 87-6016

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    William Herman Glazebrook filed a Section 1983 claim against prison officials which the district court denied. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found his appeal to be without merit based on recent authoritative decisions. The appeals court denied Glazebrook in forma pauperis status, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Glazebrook's initial Section 1983 claim.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    William Herman Glazebrook v. William P. Rogers, Warden, 819 F.2d 1137, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Herman Glazebrook filed a Section 1983 claim against prison officials which the district court denied. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found his appeal to be without merit based on recent authoritative decisions. The appeals court denied Glazebrook in forma pauperis status, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Glazebrook's initial Section 1983 claim.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    819 F.

    2d 1137
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    William Herman GLAZEBROOK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    William P. ROGERS, Warden, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 87-6016.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted April 14, 1987.
    Decided May 21, 1987.

    Before HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    William H. Glazebrook, appellant pro se.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dispense with oral argument and
    dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Glazebrook v. Rogers,
    C/A No. 86-1491-AM (E.D.Va., Jan. 29, 1987).

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like