Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Joe Ferguson, A/K/A Joseph Anthony Ferguson v. Sam Samples, Warden Us Region Parole Commission, 829 F.2d 35, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1987 in which Joe Ferguson appealed the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling without hearing oral arguments, finding that the issues had been recently decided in other cases. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning for refusing habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-09-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 829 F.2d 35 Docket: 87-7548

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1987 in which Joe Ferguson appealed the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling without hearing oral arguments, finding that the issues had been recently decided in other cases. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning for refusing habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Joe Ferguson, A/K/A Joseph Anthony Ferguson v. Sam Samples, Warden Us Region Parole Commission, 829 F.2d 35, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1987 in which Joe Ferguson appealed the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling without hearing oral arguments, finding that the issues had been recently decided in other cases. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning for refusing habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    829 F.

    2d 35
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Joe FERGUSON, a/k/a Joseph Anthony Ferguson, PetitionerAppellant,
    v.
    Sam SAMPLES, Warden; US Region Parole Commission,
    Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 87-7548

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted June 16, 1987.
    Decided September 4, 1987.

    Joe Ferguson, appellant pro se.


    Before ERVIN, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 is
    without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided
    authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below
    on the reasoning of the district court. Ferguson v. Samples, C/A No. 86-1108HC (E.D.N.C., March 4, 1987).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like