Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Yarid v. Gibson, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order dismissing George Alexander Yarid's civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It denied Yarid's motions to seal facts and legal materials, and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the issues were adequately presented and argument would not aid its decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-10-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-1404

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order dismissing George Alexander Yarid's civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It denied Yarid's motions to seal facts and legal materials, and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the issues were adequately presented and argument would not aid its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Yarid v. Gibson, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order dismissing George Alexander Yarid's civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It denied Yarid's motions to seal facts and legal materials, and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the issues were adequately presented and argument would not aid its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-1404

    GEORGE ALEXANDER YARID,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    JEAN JACK GIBSON; LUIS B. CALEX; HARRY BENSON; REGINALD P.
    FRANKLIN,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:10-cv-00143-JRS)

    Submitted:

    September 30, 2010

    Decided:

    October 7, 2010

    Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    George Alexander Yarid, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    George
    order dismissing

    Alexander
    his

    Yarid

    civil

    appeals

    complaint.

    record and find no reversible error.

    the
    We

    have

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    reviewed

    the

    Yarid v. Gibson, No.

    3:10-cv-00143-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2010).

    facts

    courts

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    seal are denied.

    district

    Yarids motions to

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like