Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anderson v. City of Rock Hill, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Edward Anderson's civil action for failure to timely serve process. The district court had accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Therefore, the appellate court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Anderson's civil action.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-08-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1619

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Edward Anderson's civil action for failure to timely serve process. The district court had accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Therefore, the appellate court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Anderson's civil action.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Anderson v. City of Rock Hill, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Edward Anderson's civil action for failure to timely serve process. The district court had accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Therefore, the appellate court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Anderson's civil action.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1619

    EDWARD W. ANDERSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CITY OF ROCK HILL; SHEAKLEY UNI SERVICE,
    INCORPORATED; LYN KOVEN; LINDA WORKMAN; LARRY
    BIGAM; JESSE FUNDERBURK; DAWN BEYERS; DAVID
    YOUNG; WANDA MORRIS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (CA-04-22892-0)

    Submitted:

    August 18, 2005

    Decided:

    August 23, 2005

    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Edward W. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Franklin Thompson,


    Jr., MALONE, THOMPSON & SUMMERS, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina;
    David Bradley Jordan, Geoffry Mark Dunn, JORDAN LAW FIRM, P.C.,
    Rock Hill, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Edward W. Anderson appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
    without prejudice his civil action for failure to timely serve
    process. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Anderson v. City of Rock Hill, No. CA-04-22892-0 (D.S.C. Apr. 20,
    2005).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like