Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Funderburk v. Conley, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case involving Landon Morris Funderburk Jr. filing a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 against Joyce K. Conley, the warden of the prison. The district court denied relief on the petition. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-10-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6789

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case involving Landon Morris Funderburk Jr. filing a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 against Joyce K. Conley, the warden of the prison. The district court denied relief on the petition. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Funderburk v. Conley, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case involving Landon Morris Funderburk Jr. filing a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 against Joyce K. Conley, the warden of the prison. The district court denied relief on the petition. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6789

    LANDON MORRIS FUNDERBURK, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOYCE K. CONLEY, Warden,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District
    Judge. (CA-00-256-5)

    Submitted:

    October 10, 2000

    Decided:

    October 20, 2000

    Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Landon Morris Funderburk, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Michael Lee
    Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Landon Morris Funderburk, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) petition.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See Funderburk v. Conley, No. CA-00-256-5 (S.D. W. Va. May

    26, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like