Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lewis v. Soles, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    52 views2 pages
    Charles Leon Lewis filed a § 1983 complaint against Bobby Soles, superintendent of the prison where Lewis was incarcerated. The district court denied Lewis relief and Lewis appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Lewis' complaint without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-12-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7260

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Leon Lewis filed a § 1983 complaint against Bobby Soles, superintendent of the prison where Lewis was incarcerated. The district court denied Lewis relief and Lewis appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Lewis' complaint without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    52 views2 pages

    Lewis v. Soles, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Leon Lewis filed a § 1983 complaint against Bobby Soles, superintendent of the prison where Lewis was incarcerated. The district court denied Lewis relief and Lewis appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Lewis' complaint without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7260

    CHARLES LEON LEWIS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BOBBY SOLES, Superintendent,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.
    (CA-98-644-2)

    Submitted:

    November 19, 1998

    Decided:

    December 3, 1998

    Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charles Leon Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Leon Lewis appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. See Lewis v. Soles, No. CA-98-644-2 (E.D. Va. July
    31, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like