Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Phillips v. Saar, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Kenneth Phillips appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Mary Ann Saar and Frank C. Sizer, Jr. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasoning for denying relief to Phillips. The court dispensed with oral arguments, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-05-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7916

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kenneth Phillips appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Mary Ann Saar and Frank C. Sizer, Jr. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasoning for denying relief to Phillips. The court dispensed with oral arguments, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Phillips v. Saar, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kenneth Phillips appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Mary Ann Saar and Frank C. Sizer, Jr. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasoning for denying relief to Phillips. The court dispensed with oral arguments, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7916

    KENNETH PHILLIPS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MARY ANN SAAR, Secretary; FRANK C. SIZER, JR.,
    Commissioner,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA04-3674-JFM)

    Submitted: May 18, 2006

    Decided: May 30, 2006

    Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kenneth Phillips, Appellant Pro Se.


    John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
    Attorney General, David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
    GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kenneth

    Phillips

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    order

    We have

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Phillips v.

    Saar, No. CA-04-3674-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 2, 2005).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like