Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Simpson v. Butterfield, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    Herman K. Simpson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Simpson appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court denied Simpson's motion for a certificate of appealability and ruled oral arguments were not necessary, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-05-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7566

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Herman K. Simpson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Simpson appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court denied Simpson's motion for a certificate of appealability and ruled oral arguments were not necessary, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views2 pages

    Simpson v. Butterfield, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Herman K. Simpson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Simpson appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court denied Simpson's motion for a certificate of appealability and ruled oral arguments were not necessary, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7566

    HERMAN K. SIMPSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    G. K. BUTTERFIELD, JR.; RALPH A. WHITE; EDWARD
    W. GRANNIS, JR.; GEORGE T. GRIFFIN; WILLIAM N.
    FARRELL, JR.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-01-414-5-F)

    Submitted:

    March 25, 2002

    Decided:

    May 29, 2002

    Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Herman K. Simpson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Herman K. Simpson appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Simpson v. Butterfield, No. CA-01-414-5-F (E.D.N.C.
    July 19, 2001).

    We deny Simpsons motion for a certificate of

    appealability and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like