Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lamont v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Leopold Lamont's motion for reconsideration. The court reviewed Lamont's appeal challenging the denial of his motion for a downward departure based on substantial assistance. Finding no reversible error, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying the motion for reconsideration for the reasons stated in that court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-05-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7534

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Leopold Lamont's motion for reconsideration. The court reviewed Lamont's appeal challenging the denial of his motion for a downward departure based on substantial assistance. Finding no reversible error, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying the motion for reconsideration for the reasons stated in that court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Lamont v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Leopold Lamont's motion for reconsideration. The court reviewed Lamont's appeal challenging the denial of his motion for a downward departure based on substantial assistance. Finding no reversible error, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying the motion for reconsideration for the reasons stated in that court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7534

    LEOPOLD F. LAMONT,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
    District Judge. (CR-96-101-V)

    Submitted:

    April 24, 2003

    Decided:

    May 1, 2003

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Leopold F. Lamont, Appellant Pro Se.


    Gretchen C.F. Shappert,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Leopold F. Lamont appeals from the district courts order
    denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his Fed. R.
    Crim. P. 35(b) motion for a downward departure based on his
    substantial assistance.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    See Lamont v. United States, No. CR-96-101-V

    (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 25, 2002; entered Sept. 26, 2002).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like