Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Phillips v. State of SC, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Ronnie Phillips appealed the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied Phillips a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-06-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6077

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ronnie Phillips appealed the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied Phillips a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Phillips v. State of SC, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronnie Phillips appealed the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied Phillips a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6077

    RONNIE PHILLIPS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES MOLONY
    CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South
    Carolina,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-99-313-3-13BC)

    Submitted:

    May 25, 2000

    Decided:

    June 5, 2000

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Ronnie Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronnie Phillips appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Phillips v. South Carolina, No. CA-99-313-3-13BC

    (D.S.C. Dec. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like