Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Raymond Foster Shelton v. State of North Carolina, 972 F.2d 341, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The document summarizes an appeals court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court dismissed an appeal from Raymond Foster Shelton, who had sought habeas corpus relief from his conviction in district court. The appeals court found no merit to Shelton's appeal after reviewing the record and district court's opinion. It denied Shelton's request for a certificate of probable cause and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its earlier denial of habeas relief. Additionally, the appeals court denied Shelton's motions to produce documents and require the Post Office to trace mailings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-08-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 972 F.2d 341 Docket: 92-6482

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes an appeals court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court dismissed an appeal from Raymond Foster Shelton, who had sought habeas corpus relief from his conviction in district court. The appeals court found no merit to Shelton's appeal after reviewing the record and district court's opinion. It denied Shelton's request for a certificate of probable cause and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its earlier denial of habeas relief. Additionally, the appeals court denied Shelton's motions to produce documents and require the Post Office to trace mailings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Raymond Foster Shelton v. State of North Carolina, 972 F.2d 341, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes an appeals court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court dismissed an appeal from Raymond Foster Shelton, who had sought habeas corpus relief from his conviction in district court. The appeals court found no merit to Shelton's appeal after reviewing the record and district court's opinion. It denied Shelton's request for a certificate of probable cause and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its earlier denial of habeas relief. Additionally, the appeals court denied Shelton's motions to produce documents and require the Post Office to trace mailings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    972 F.

    2d 341

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Raymond Foster SHELTON, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    STATE of North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 92-6482.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 20, 1992
    Decided: August 4, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-92229-HC)
    Raymond Foster Shelton, Appellant Pro Se.
    E.D.N.C.
    Dismissed.
    Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    OPINION
    PER CURIAM:

    Raymond Foster Shelton seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing
    habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). Our review of the
    record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the

    appeal on the reasoning of the district court. * Shelton v. North Carolina, No.
    CA-92-229-HC (E.D.N.C. Apr. 1, 1992). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    Shelton moved in this Court for an order to produce documents and an order to
    require the Post Office to trace certain mailings. Those motions are denied

    You might also like