Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Elmer Leon Peterson v. Edward Grannis, 972 F.2d 341, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. It involves a petitioner, Elmer Leon Peterson, who appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-08-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 972 F.2d 341 Docket: 92-6548

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. It involves a petitioner, Elmer Leon Peterson, who appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Elmer Leon Peterson v. Edward Grannis, 972 F.2d 341, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. It involves a petitioner, Elmer Leon Peterson, who appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    972 F.

    2d 341

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Elmer Leon PETERSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Edward GRANNIS, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 92-6548.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 20, 1992
    Decided: August 6, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-91710-HC-BO)
    Elmer Leon Peterson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North
    Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    E.D.N.C.
    Affirmed.
    Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    OPINION
    PER CURIAM:

    Elmer Leon Peterson appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under
    28 U.S.C. 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's

    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on


    the reasoning of the district court. Peterson v. Grannis, No. CA-91-710-HC-BO
    (E.D.N.C. May 12, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like