Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McNeill v. Morton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding two cases brought by Matthew Eugene McNeill under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against two police detectives, Jerome Morton and Mickey Biggs. The district court denied relief in both cases. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals were submitted on briefs without oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6402

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding two cases brought by Matthew Eugene McNeill under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against two police detectives, Jerome Morton and Mickey Biggs. The district court denied relief in both cases. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals were submitted on briefs without oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    McNeill v. Morton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding two cases brought by Matthew Eugene McNeill under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against two police detectives, Jerome Morton and Mickey Biggs. The district court denied relief in both cases. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals were submitted on briefs without oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6402

    MATTHEW EUGENE MCNEILL,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JEROME MORTON, Detective,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    No. 96-6403

    MATTHEW EUGENE MCNEILL,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICKEY BIGGS, Detective,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District
    Judge. (CA-96-18-5-CT-BR, CA-96-19-5-CT-BR)
    Submitted:

    July 23, 1996

    Decided:

    August 5, 1996

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Matthew Eugene McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. McNeill v. Morton, No. CA-96-18-5-CT-BR; McNeill v. Biggs,
    No. CA-96-19-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like