Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • James v. Huskins, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    Terrance James filed a § 1983 complaint against W.A. Huskings which was denied by the district court. James appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief to James.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6976

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Terrance James filed a § 1983 complaint against W.A. Huskings which was denied by the district court. James appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief to James.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views2 pages

    James v. Huskins, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Terrance James filed a § 1983 complaint against W.A. Huskings which was denied by the district court. James appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief to James.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6976

    TERRANCE LAMOUNT JAMES,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    W. A. HUSKINS,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-04-88)

    Submitted:

    August 18, 2005

    Decided:

    August 26, 2005

    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Terrance Lamount James, Appellant Pro Se.


    Sandra Moody King,
    RUSSELL & KING, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Terrance Lamount James appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See James v.

    Huskins, No. CA-04-88 (W.D.N.C. June 13, 2005).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like