Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. James Vassell, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 1999 in which James Vassell appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-07-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6128

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 1999 in which James Vassell appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. James Vassell, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 1999 in which James Vassell appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6128

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JAMES VASSELL,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CR-89-190, CA-95-11-2)

    Submitted:

    July 22, 1999

    Decided:

    July 27, 1999

    Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James Vassell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James Vassell appeals the district courts order denying his
    motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.
    district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    See United States v. Vassell, Nos. CR-89-190; CA-

    95-11-2 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 7, 1999). We dispense with oral argument


    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like