Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tatum v. MD House of Corr, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Leamon L. Tatum v. Maryland House of Correction et al. In a brief per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's denial of relief to Tatum on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision and affirmed based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-8501

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Leamon L. Tatum v. Maryland House of Correction et al. In a brief per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's denial of relief to Tatum on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision and affirmed based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Tatum v. MD House of Corr, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Leamon L. Tatum v. Maryland House of Correction et al. In a brief per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's denial of relief to Tatum on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision and affirmed based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-8501

    LEAMON L. TATUM,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION; DIVISION OF
    CORRECTION; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner,
    Department of Correction; WILLIAM L. SMITH,
    Warden, Maryland House of Correction; M.
    MAGWOOD, Sergeant; CHARLES WHIMS, Dietary
    Supervisor,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-2362-S)
    Submitted:

    March 26, 1996

    Decided:

    April 10, 1996

    Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Leamon L. Tatum, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
    Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Tatum v. Maryland House of Correction, No. CA-95-2362-S (D.
    Md. Nov. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like