Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Williams v. Jarvis, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Theodore Williams appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appellate court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-06-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6570

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Theodore Williams appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appellate court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Williams v. Jarvis, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Theodore Williams appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appellate court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6570

    THEODORE J. WILLIAMS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MACK JARVIS; DANIEL L. STIENEKE; HATTIE
    PIMPONG; LINWOOD E. STANCILL; JOHN TAYLOR;
    HUGH MARTIN; CARL BATTLE; ZEB HEATH; HAROLD
    SMALLS; JOHN MILLS; ROOSEVELT STRICKLAND; JIM
    BEANE; DONALD PEACH; CAROL WHITAKER; PHIL
    HOLHOUSER;
    FRED
    B.
    MURCHISON;
    WILLIAM
    SOUTHERN; DAVID BOBO; MITCH JOHNSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-25-5-BO)

    Submitted:

    June 17, 1999

    Decided:

    June 23, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Theodore J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Theodore J. Williams appeals the district courts order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the districts opinion and
    find no reversible error.
    of the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

    See Williams v. Jarvis, No. CA-99-25-5-BO

    (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like