Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Keith A. Campbell, 878 F.2d 1431, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views1 page
    Keith Campbell appealed the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion challenging the dismissal of his second 28 U.S.C. Section 2255 motion as successive. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court's finding that Campbell did not present a valid basis for Rule 60(b) relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Campbell's motion without oral argument, as the dispositive issues had been recently decided in other cases.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-07-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 878 F.2d 1431 Docket: 88-7280

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Keith Campbell appealed the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion challenging the dismissal of his second 28 U.S.C. Section 2255 motion as successive. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court's finding that Campbell did not present a valid basis for Rule 60(b) relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Campbell's motion without oral argument, as the dispositive issues had been recently decided in other cases.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views1 page

    United States v. Keith A. Campbell, 878 F.2d 1431, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Keith Campbell appealed the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion challenging the dismissal of his second 28 U.S.C. Section 2255 motion as successive. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court's finding that Campbell did not present a valid basis for Rule 60(b) relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Campbell's motion without oral argument, as the dispositive issues had been recently decided in other cases.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    878 F.

    2d 1431
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Keith A. CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 88-7280.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted April 25, 1989.
    Decided July 5, 1989.

    Keith Anthony Campbell, appellant pro se.


    John C. Belcher, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
    Before K.K. HALL, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Keith A. Campbell appeals the denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion in


    which he challenged the dismissal of his second 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion as
    successive. We agree with the district court that Campbell has presented no
    basis for relief under Rule 60(b) and therefore find no abuse of discretion in the
    denial of relief. United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310 (4th Cir.1982). We
    dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been
    decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like