Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jermaine Chapman, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    30 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Jermaine Chapman appealed the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of Chapman's motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-06-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6190

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Jermaine Chapman appealed the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of Chapman's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    30 views2 pages

    United States v. Jermaine Chapman, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Jermaine Chapman appealed the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of Chapman's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6190

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    JERMAINE CHAPMAN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
    Senior District Judge. (4:07-cr-00022-HCM-JEB-1)

    Submitted:

    May 31, 2012

    Decided:

    June 6, 2012

    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jermaine Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jermaine

    Chapman

    appeals

    the

    district

    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006) motion.


    the record and find no reversible error.

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Chapman, No. 4:07-cr-00022-HCM-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 9, &


    entered Jan. 10, 2012).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like