Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Baggett, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Deidre Baggett's appeal of a district court's denial of her motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Baggett's motion for relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6852

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Deidre Baggett's appeal of a district court's denial of her motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Baggett's motion for relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Baggett, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Deidre Baggett's appeal of a district court's denial of her motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Baggett's motion for relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6852

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DEIDRE L. BAGGETT, a/k/a DeDe, a/k/a Deidre L.
    Willingham,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-161-A, CA-99-736-AM)

    Submitted:

    August 19, 1999

    Decided:

    August 26, 1999

    Before WIDENER and KING,* Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Deidre L. Baggett, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Victoria Boros
    Major, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Judge King did not participate in consideration of this


    case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28
    U.S.C. 46(d) (1994).

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Deidre Baggett appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certifi-

    cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court.

    See United States v. Baggett, Nos. CR-91-161-

    A; CA-99-736-AM (E.D. Va. May 25, 1999).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like