Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Davis v. Taylor, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Richard Davis, an inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Davis appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6365

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Richard Davis, an inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Davis appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Davis v. Taylor, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Richard Davis, an inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Davis appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6365

    RICHARD GREGG DAVIS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    J. B. TAYLOR, Warden; BOBBY W. SOLES, Assistant Warden; BARBARA WHEELER, Head of Treatment; PEGGY SPICER; A. SMITH, Lieutenant,
    Security Staff; J. LYTTLE, Sergeant, Security
    Staff,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-95-1150-2)
    Submitted:

    June 20, 1996

    Decided:

    July 9, 1996

    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Richard Gregg Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
    1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Taylor,
    No. CA-95-1150-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like