Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Harris v. Hawkins, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Barry L. Harris's § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The district court dismissed the complaint for the reasons stated in its October 11, 2005 order. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's ruling after reviewing the record. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before it.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-02-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7698

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Barry L. Harris's § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The district court dismissed the complaint for the reasons stated in its October 11, 2005 order. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's ruling after reviewing the record. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before it.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Harris v. Hawkins, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Barry L. Harris's § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The district court dismissed the complaint for the reasons stated in its October 11, 2005 order. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's ruling after reviewing the record. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before it.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7698

    BARRY L. HARRIS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CAPTAIN HAWKINS, Captain/Security;
    WYNN,
    Sergeant/Security;
    OFFICER
    Officer/Security,

    SERGEANT
    TALLEY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Robert G. Doumar, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-05-567-2-RGD)

    Submitted: January 26, 2006

    Decided:

    February 3, 2006

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Barry L. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Barry

    L.

    Harris

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C.


    1983 (2000).
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    See Harris v. Hawkins, No. CA-05-567-2-RGD (E.D.

    Va. Oct. 11, 2005).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like