Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Burgest v. Wiley, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    1) Lamar Burgest filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 which was denied by the district court. 2) Burgest appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision and affirmed the denial, adopting the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit also denied Burgest's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-08-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6603

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Lamar Burgest filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 which was denied by the district court. 2) Burgest appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision and affirmed the denial, adopting the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit also denied Burgest's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Burgest v. Wiley, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Lamar Burgest filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 which was denied by the district court. 2) Burgest appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision and affirmed the denial, adopting the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit also denied Burgest's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6603

    LAMAR E. BURGEST, III,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RON WILEY, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (CA-04-115-3)

    Submitted:

    August 18, 2004

    Decided:

    August 25, 2004

    Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lamar E. Burgest, III, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lamar E. Burgest, III, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district courts order denying relief on his petition filed under
    28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000).
    reversible error.
    district court.
    Mar. 15, 2004).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See Burgest v. Wiley, No. CA-04-115-3 (E.D. Va.
    We deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma

    pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like